EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Empathy, Engagement, Equity: The Three Pillars of Tomorrow’s Curriculum

Sayed Mahbub Hasan Amiri

International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, 2025, vol. 12, issue 6, 693-708

Abstract: The industrial age-based education system, based on conformity and measurement, fails to align with 21st-century needs the integrated emotional, cultural and technological needs of our century. This paper explores a set of curricular principles upon which empathy, engagement and equity are placed at the centre of the transformation of learners for a challenging world of change. Existing studies highlight the importance of SEL and student-centred pedagogy yet there remains a gap in the fuller integration of these dimensions in dismantling systemic inequities and promoting meaningful participation. When I say this, it is because this is about as simple as I get, in terms of opposing current systems that favour academic micro-results over the fully human; offering power to the power-less, and which disserve underserved populations and work from a paradigm of disaffection. Borrowed from a fusion of conceptual perspectives of compassionate pedagogy, universal design for learning (UDL), and critical race theory this work posits that empathy drives inclusive classrooms, engagement empowers learners though unique voice and interest, and equity carries the whole by removing the structural barriers. Some key findings are that curricula that integrate empathy-building activities in the classroom (such as perspective-taking play) are associated with better cooperation and less bullying and that equity-focused practices such as culturally responsive teaching close achievement gaps. Approaches to engagement such as project-based learning and student choice clearly do have motivational and thinking-in-the-right-way effects. The implications for policymakers, educators, curriculum designers, couldn’t be timelier: Rethink assessment, invest in training around SEL and anti-bias for educators, reallocate resources to low-funded schools. This framework demands that our community leave behind token reforms and accept systemic change that centres education as the transformative engine for social justice and collective rising. Without these shifts, the vision of high-quality, future-ready education will go steady unfulfilled for many.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/d ... -issue-6/693-708.pdf (application/pdf)
https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/artic ... omorrows-curriculum/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bjc:journl:v:12:y:2025:i:6:p:693-708

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation is currently edited by Dr. Renu Malsaria

More articles in International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation from International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dr. Renu Malsaria ().

 
Page updated 2025-08-11
Handle: RePEc:bjc:journl:v:12:y:2025:i:6:p:693-708