Comparative Analysis of Special Moment Bearing Frame System with Modified Structure Planning Using Double System on Bluecross Medika International Beauty Clinic Building

Anggik Ayu Trisnawati, I. Ketut Yasa Bagiarta and Putu Aryastana
Additional contact information
Anggik Ayu Trisnawati: Department of Civil Engineering, Warmadewa University, Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia
I. Ketut Yasa Bagiarta: Department of Civil Engineering, Warmadewa University, Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia
Putu Aryastana: Department of Civil Engineering, Warmadewa University, Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia Master of Infrastructure and Environmental Engineering, Warmadewa University, Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia

International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science, 2025, vol. 10, issue 7, 1337-1347

Abstract: In line with the developments that occur, many high-rise buildings are increasingly being built. An important consideration in the planning of multi-storey buildings is the earthquake force, so it is necessary to choose a good structural system in overcoming these problems. The special moment-bearing frame system is one of the structural systems that is often chosen. In addition, the moment-bearing frame system is often combined with shear walls (Double System), As shear walls enhance earthquake resistance. The purpose of this research is to compare the planning of SMRFS (Special moment resisting frame system) and Dual System structures and compare the efficiency of the behavior of these structures. The comparison of SRPMK and Dual System planning lies in the parameters used in earthquake loading, where the value of (R) = 8, (Ω0) = 3, (Cd) = 5.5 for SRPMK and (R) = 7, (Ω0) = 2.5, (Cd) = 5.5 for Dual System. The x-direction SRMPK structure is 25,463 mm and the y-direction is 22,905 mm, for the dual system the x-direction is 16,507 mm and the y-direction is 20,508 mm. The use of dual system structures is more efficient because the resulting displacement value is smaller than SRPMK. The deviation values of the two structures meet the criteria for deviation requirements, and the use of dual systems is better at accepting earthquake loads than SRPMK. By comparing the SMRFS and the dual system, we can find out the right decision in choosing the most appropriate structural system, resulting in a safe, reliable and efficient building.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrias/ ... ssue-7/1337-1347.pdf (application/pdf)
https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrias/arti ... uty-clinic-building/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bjf:journl:v:10:y:2025:i:7:p:1337-1347

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science is currently edited by Dr. Renu Malsaria

More articles in International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science from International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science (IJRIAS)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dr. Renu Malsaria ().