Evaluation of Potencies of Different Brands of Piroxicam in Wistar Rats

B. Cletus Lemii and A. Georgewill Owunari
Additional contact information
B. Cletus Lemii: Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Basic Clinical Sciences, College of Medical Sciences, Rivers State University, Port Harcourt, Nigeria
A. Georgewill Owunari: Department of pharmacology, Faculty of Basic Clinical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt, Nigeria

International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science, 2021, vol. 6, issue 9, 151-156

Abstract: Background: Piroxicam is one of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), commonly used because of single daily regimen which eases compliance and had complaints on the significant dissimilarities in the physico-chemical properties across various brands. This study aimed at evaluating the potencies and toxicity profiles of different brands of Piroxicam in male Wistar rats. Healthy ninety (90) male Wistar rats, weighing between 180 and 230grams were procured from the animal house of the Pharmacology department, Faculty of Basic Clinical Sciences in University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria. METHODS: The animals were allocated into six (6) groups of five (5) animals each, for each experimental phase -Group1-control group, 2 to 6 –treatment groups. The experiment involved three different phases: anti-inflammation, anti-pyrexia and analgesia. Experimental inflammatory, pyretic and pain situations were induced on the study animals using egg albumin (0.1ml, 20% in 0.9% normal saline), 60% baker’s yeast (1ml/100g rats’ body weight), and analgesimeter respectively. Thereafter, the clinical dose (0.285mg/kg) of Piroxicam brands (A Brand, B Brand, C Brand, D Brand and E Brand) were administered on treatment groups. The dose-effect of the Piroxicam brands were observed at different times (0, 30, 60, and 120, 180 and 240 minutes). RESULTS: Result reveals that, the five Piroxicam brands demonstrated significant (p A Brand > B Brand >C Brand>E Brand; Anti-pyretic potencies― C Brand>B Brand>E Brand>A Brand>D Brand. Analgesic potencies ― B Brand>E Brand>C Brand>D Brand>A Brand. CONCLUSION: The overall order of potencies of the stated brands indicated that B Brand>C Brand>E Brand>A Brand≥D Brand.

Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrias/ ... -issue-9/151-156.pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.rsisinternational.org/virtual-library/ ... 051938702.1694191524 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bjf:journl:v:6:y:2021:i:9:p:151-156

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science is currently edited by Dr. Renu Malsaria

More articles in International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science from International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science (IJRIAS)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dr. Renu Malsaria ().