Determinants of Bank Closures: Do Levels or Changes of CAMEL Variables Matter?
Mikko Mäkinen and
Laura Solanko ()
Additional contact information
Laura Solanko: BOFIT, Bank of Finland
Russian Journal of Money and Finance, 2018, vol. 77, issue 2, 3-21
This study examines the role of levels and changes in bank balance sheet variables in explaining bank closure. Using a unique set of monthly bank-level panel data from Russia, we estimate determinants of bank license withdrawals during 2013M7-2017M7. We make two key findings. First, changes in CAMEL indicators are always significantly correlated with probability of bank closure, and the magnitude of parameter estimates decreases with the lag length. Second, while the one-month lagged levels of capital, earnings, and liquidity are significantly associated with the probability of bank closure in the subsequent month, the level of liquidity is the only significant indicator for longer lags. Our key contribution that changes in CAMEL variables matter more than levels is robust to various robustness checks.
Keywords: Bank closure; bank failure; CAMEL indicators; Russia's banking sector (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G2 G21 G33 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bkr:journl:v:77:y:2018:i:2:p:3-21
Access Statistics for this article
Russian Journal of Money and Finance is currently edited by Ksenia Yudaeva
More articles in Russian Journal of Money and Finance from Bank of Russia Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Olga Kuvshinova ().