Audit Fees, Non‐Audit Fees and Auditor Going‐Concern Reporting Decisions in the United Kingdom

Ilias G. Basioudis, Evangelos Papakonstantinou and Marshall A. Geiger

Abacus, 2008, vol. 44, issue 3, 284-309

Abstract: The accounting profession has come under increased scrutiny over recent years about the growing number of non‐audit fees received from audit clients and the possible negative impact of such fees on auditor independence. The argument advanced is that providing substantial amounts of non‐audit services to clients may make it more likely that auditors concede to the wishes of the client management when difficult judgments are made. Such concerns are particularly salient in the case of reporting decisions related to going‐concern uncertainties for financially stressed clients. This study empirically examines audit reports provided to financially stressed companies in the United Kingdom and the magnitude of audit and non‐audit service fees paid to the company's auditors. We find that the magnitude of both audit fees and non‐audit fees are significantly associated with the issuance of a going‐concern modified audit opinion. In particular, financially stressed companies with high audit fees are more likely to receive a going‐concern modified audit opinion, whereas companies with high non‐audit fees are less likely to receive a going‐concern modified audit opinion. Additional analyses indicate that the results are generally robust across alternative model and variable specifications. Overall, evidence supports the contention that high non‐audit fees have a detrimental effect on going‐concern reporting judgments for financially stressed U.K. companies.

Date: 2008
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (18)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2008.00263.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:abacus:v:44:y:2008:i:3:p:284-309

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0001-3072

Access Statistics for this article

Abacus is currently edited by G.W. Dean and S. Jones

More articles in Abacus from Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().