Research Design Issues in Studies Using Discretionary Accruals

Maureen F. McNichols and Stephen R. Stubben

Abacus, 2018, vol. 54, issue 2, 227-246

Abstract: Because discretionary accruals are known to be noisy proxies of earnings management that often produce biased results, we argue that a correlation between discretionary accruals and a hypothesized factor is generally not an adequate basis for valid inferences about earnings management. In this commentary, we propose and discuss a set of suggestions for improving the research design of studies on earnings management that use discretionary accruals. Specifically, we discuss suggestions for developing predictions about earnings management, choosing among discretionary accrual proxies, estimating discretionary accruals, addressing potential bias in the estimates, and critically evaluating the results obtained.

Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (13)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12128

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:abacus:v:54:y:2018:i:2:p:227-246

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0001-3072

Access Statistics for this article

Abacus is currently edited by G.W. Dean and S. Jones

More articles in Abacus from Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().