Is Fair Value Always the Relevant Measure of Liabilities? Evidence from Bond Trades in the Secondary Market

Dongyi Wang

Abacus, 2026, vol. 62, issue 2, 574-600

Abstract: Liabilities measured at fair value is a controversial topic, with major criticisms still unaddressed. Despite these criticisms, standard setters have chosen to move forward with a fair value oriented balance sheet. This study addresses two of these major criticisms by examining whether liabilities measured at fair value bring relevant information to the estimation of credit risk. Using the credit spreads of US non‐financial firms as a proxy for credit risk, the results show that liabilities measured at fair value are not as relevant to credit risk estimation as liabilities measured on a non‐fair value basis. Additionally, this study finds no support for the claim that the relevance of liabilities at fair value depends on a symmetrical application to the asset side of the balance sheet. Taken together, this study provides evidence that fair value is not always the relevant measure of liabilities.

Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12369

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:abacus:v:62:y:2026:i:2:p:574-600

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0001-3072

Access Statistics for this article

Abacus is currently edited by G.W. Dean and S. Jones

More articles in Abacus from Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().