Economics of erosion‐control and seed‐fertilizer technologies for hillside farming in Honduras

Miguel A. López‐Pereira, John H. Sanders, Timothy G. Baker and Paul V. Preckel

Agricultural Economics, 1994, vol. 11, issue 2-3, 271-288

Abstract: With population growth still at very high rates and large‐scale commercial farmers and cattle ranchers owning much of the more fertile valley land, small‐scale farmers are concentrated on increasingly marginal, steeply sloping hillsides in Central America. The continuing soil erosion and land degradation in these low‐input staple crop production hillside farming systems lead many to be pessimistic about increasing the agricultural incomes of these farmers. However, this study shows that the appropriate combination of improved technologies and agricultural policy or alternative production diversification strategies can improve the incomes of small‐scale hillside farmers in southern Honduras by over 50%. The technology components considered are stone walls and ditches combined with living tree barriers to prevent erosion of the hillsides, and a package of improved sorghum seed, seed treatment, and modest doses of nitrogenous fertilizer. A whole‐farm mathematical programming framework is used to determine the potential farm‐level income effects of the soil‐conservation and seed‐fertilizer technologies. The main conclusion is that erosion‐control devices and yield‐increasing crop varieties and fertilizer are an effective technology introduction strategy for the erosion‐prone hillside landholdings found in many areas of Central America. If policy actions or diversification strategies for disposal of surplus grain are found which are effective in reducing the risk of low income from cereal price reductions in high‐production years, adoption of the improved technologies is shown to be profitable for small‐scale farmers. Another benefit not explicitly considered would be to slow the very rapid growth of urban poverty in these countries. Sensitivity analysis results indicated that neither risk aversion nor the increased availability of crop land or initial cash have any substantial effects on the predicted adoption level of the improved technologies, or on their income impacts for these farmers.

Date: 1994
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.1994.tb00337.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:agecon:v:11:y:1994:i:2-3:p:271-288

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0169-5150

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Economics is currently edited by W.A. Masters and G.E. Shively

More articles in Agricultural Economics from International Association of Agricultural Economists Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().