Efficiency of U.S. conservation‐compliance program
Ramu Govindasamy and
Wallace Huffman
Agricultural Economics, 1993, vol. 8, issue 2, 173-185
Abstract:
Under the conservation‐compliance program, most of the individual producers are forced to cut their soil erosion to 7 t per acre annually irrespective of the marginal cost of controlling soil erosion. In a system where coupons to a ton of soil loss were issued to producers and traded, the marginal cost of controlling soil loss within each soil type and across different soil types would be equalized. An instrumental variable procedure was used to determine the effect of soil erosion on net profits. The results for Iowa show that there is considerable difference in the marginal opportunity cost of controlling soil erosion between soil types. By assigning one ton of erosion to Iowa soil type Downs (5‐10% slope) instead of Clarion (2‐5% slope), there is a savings of $5.00 per acre for the society as a whole. The tradable coupon system is not only efficient, but will also bring in more land under soil conservation.
Date: 1993
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.1993.tb00240.x
Related works:
Journal Article: Efficiency of U.S. conservation-compliance program (1993) 
Working Paper: Efficiency of U.S. Conservation-Compliance Program (1993)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:agecon:v:8:y:1993:i:2:p:173-185
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0169-5150
Access Statistics for this article
Agricultural Economics is currently edited by W.A. Masters and G.E. Shively
More articles in Agricultural Economics from International Association of Agricultural Economists Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().