 Relevance disagreements and unclear request formsJohn O'Connor American Documentation, 1967, vol. 18, issue 3, 165-177 Abstract: Disagreements about the relevance of documents to retrieval requests occur because relevance judges differently interpret requests or documents. Requests may be differently interpreted because they are unclear. Well‐known types of request obscurity are reviewed. Less well known is that a request may be unclear because its form—“documents about subject S,” “documents answering question Q,” etc.—is unclear. Explications are developed of the meanings of the request forms just given and several others. A request of any of the forms discussed is interpreted to be for documents which support statements of a specified kind in a specified way. For example, an “about S” request requires documents supporting statements which contain expression S (though several qualifications are needed); a “question Q” request requires documents which support answers to Q. Examples are given which suggest that some, perhaps all, “about S” requests are unclear. Some ways of formulating clear question requests are given. Various ways in which documents may support statements are distinguished. These depend on such factors as parts of a document used, inference strength, and background knowledge permitted. Some possibly clear support specifications are indicated. Date: 1967 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:amedoc:v:18:y:1967:i:3:p:165-177 Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from Access Statistics for this article American Documentation is currently edited by Javed Mostafa More articles in American Documentation from Wiley Blackwell |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.