Extracting the basic structure of scientific literature

Harold P. Van Cott and Albert Zavala

American Documentation, 1968, vol. 19, issue 3, 247-262

Abstract: Much of the periodical literature within scientific disciplines is characterized by overlap in content among journals and by scatter of content areas across journals. This obscures the inherent structure that may exist within the literature of a discipline, creating problems for authors seeking suitable publication outlets, for editors wishing to establish coverage policy, and for fibraries wishing to be selective but representative in acquiring journals for a discipline. Four factor analytic studies were done on samples of the periodical literature of physics in an attempt to define its inherent structure. The first study resulted in 10 factors interpreted as journal groups within physics. The remaining three studies resulted in factors that define relatively homogeneous topical or content areas. The consistency of results across the analyses justified the conclusion that factor analysis methods are applicable to defining the structure of the literature of science.

Date: 1968
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090190307

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:amedoc:v:19:y:1968:i:3:p:247-262

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1936-6108

Access Statistics for this article

American Documentation is currently edited by Javed Mostafa

More articles in American Documentation from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().