EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Zatocoding applied to mechanical organization of knowledge

Calvin N. Mooers

American Documentation, 1951, vol. 2, issue 1, 20-32

Abstract: The mechanical organization of knowledge for retrieval of stored information can no longer neglect the developments of point‐to‐point communication theory, since both deal with information and handle it by machines. The most versatile retrieval systems are those which delegate a separate tally to each information item, and which impress marks on the tally for the machine to read and to use for selective purposes. Coding is the relationship between these marks and the intellectual content of the information items. Coding determines the complexity of the selective machine and the utility of the whole process. A set of invariant coding principles is stated which define maximum coding efficiency for any tally selecting machines, and parallels are drawn between these principles and the conclusions of modern point‐to‐point communication theory. Zatocoding is defined—the system which superimposes random subject code patterns on the tally—and it is found to obey each of the invariant principles of coding efficiency while still allowing the simplest possible selector machine structure.

Date: 1951
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090020107

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:amedoc:v:2:y:1951:i:1:p:20-32

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1936-6108

Access Statistics for this article

American Documentation is currently edited by Javed Mostafa

More articles in American Documentation from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:bla:amedoc:v:2:y:1951:i:1:p:20-32