Economics at your fingertips  

Would Emergency Safeguard Measures Work for Services?

Roy Clogstoun, Ray Trewin and Malcolm Bosworth

Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, 2006, vol. 20, issue 2, 56-69

Abstract: Discussions in the WTO on Emergency Safeguards Measures (ESMs) for services are now stalemated. While possibly justified on political economy grounds if they resulted in WTO members making more liberal commitments, their main supporters (ASEAN minus Singapore) have not amply demonstrated their desirability or technical feasibility (legal and economic means). The GATS already has sufficient in‐built flexibility, and several forms of de facto safeguard provisions and other measures exist. The economic case for ESMs is weak, and the efficiency costs from capture by protectionists and lost investment from restricting established foreign investors could be potentially large. The proposed ASEAN model essentially replicates the goods’ ESM, and has a number of deficiencies, such as having no national interest or economic test. The paper suggests a number of ways that the ASEAN model could be improved if the case for ESM on services was accepted. It also examines, as an alternative to an ESM, the possibility of members introducing a waiver to temporarily withdraw services commitments should an emergency situation arise.

Date: 2006
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0818-9935

Access Statistics for this article

Asian-Pacific Economic Literature is currently edited by Ron Duncan

More articles in Asian-Pacific Economic Literature from Asia Pacific School of Economics and Government, The Australian National University
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().

Page updated 2021-03-28
Handle: RePEc:bla:apacel:v:20:y:2006:i:2:p:56-69