Public Pension Fund Management: Best Practice and International Experience

Andrew Rozanov

Asian Economic Policy Review, 2015, vol. 10, issue 2, 275-295

Abstract: type="main">

As Japan's policymakers strive to reform the Government Pension Investment Fund, this paper reviews the core principles and best practices of public pension fund management, with a particular focus on governance and investment philosophy, as distilled from the experience of some of the largest and most advanced institutional investors. It proceeds to compare and contrast three distinct models of institutional fund management: the Norway model, the Yale/Australia Future Fund model, and the Canada model. The paper concludes by making some preliminary recommendations for the Government Pension Investment Fund reform.

Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/aepr.12106 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:asiapr:v:10:y:2015:i:2:p:275-295

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=1832-8105

Access Statistics for this article

Asian Economic Policy Review is currently edited by Takatoshi Ito, Akira Kojima, Colin McKenzie and Shujiro Urata

More articles in Asian Economic Policy Review from Japan Center for Economic Research Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().