Protectionism under Trump: The China Shock, Deplorables, and the First White President

Marcus Noland

Asian Economic Policy Review, 2020, vol. 15, issue 1, 31-50

Abstract: This paper uses USA county‐level electoral data to examine the 2016 turn to protectionism. The hypothesis that support for protectionism was purely a response to globalization is rejected. Exposure to trade competition encouraged a shift to the Republican candidate, but this effect is mediated by race, diversity, education, and age. If the turn toward protectionism is due to economic dislocation, then public policy interventions could mitigate the impact and support the re‐establishment of a political consensus for open trade. If, however, the drivers are identity or cultural values, then the scope for constructive policy intervention is unclear.

Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/aepr.12274

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:asiapr:v:15:y:2020:i:1:p:31-50

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=1832-8105

Access Statistics for this article

Asian Economic Policy Review is currently edited by Takatoshi Ito, Akira Kojima, Colin McKenzie and Shujiro Urata

More articles in Asian Economic Policy Review from Japan Center for Economic Research Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().