Comprehending Comprehensive Income

Allan Hodgson and Mark Russell

Australian Accounting Review, 2014, vol. 24, issue 2, 100-110

Abstract: type="main">

Comprehensive income (CI) contains a mixture of realised, unrealised, temporary, persistent and recyclable elements. How, when and where these elements should be reported in income and equity have been issues intensively debated (and changed) by international regulators over the last 20 years. This article traces the major threads of the debate and places changes within the context of empirical academic research. Our contention is that the recent IAS 1 (AASB 101) Presentation of Financial Statements , effective 1 July 2012, has benefited from past academic research that focused on the value relevance from disaggregation and presentation of unrealised other comprehensive income (OCI). We conclude by outlining the equity posting and recycling to profit or loss (P&L) issues and assert that, because of the inconsistent nature and complexity of OCI, it would benefit from further research.

Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/auar.12022 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:ausact:v:24:y:2014:i:2:p:100-110

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=1035-6908

Access Statistics for this article

Australian Accounting Review is currently edited by Linda M. English

More articles in Australian Accounting Review from CPA Australia
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().