DO PROFIT MAXIMISERS TAKE COLD SHOWERS? ANOTHER LOOK AT PROTECTION AND TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY

Neil A. Campbell and Jeffrey Kline

Australian Economic Papers, 2005, vol. 44, issue 2, 105-109

Abstract: In this paper we consider whether a ‘cold shower’ is possible if the firm we are analysing is a conventional neoclassical profit‐maximising firm facing competitively determined prices. In the context of this analysis, the term ‘cold shower’ refers to a situation where the removal of a protective subsidy induces investment in a cost‐reducing technology. First we show that if the investment lowers marginal cost everywhere, then our firm will never respond to the removal of the subsidy by making the investment. We then use this result to carefully construct examples where the investment does not lower marginal cost everywhere. These examples are devised to illustrate a cold shower scenario where, with no protection in place, the firm makes the investment, that would have been rejected, if the protection had have been in place.

Date: 2005
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8454.2005.00251.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:ausecp:v:44:y:2005:i:2:p:105-109

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0004-900X

Access Statistics for this article

Australian Economic Papers is currently edited by Daniel Leonard

More articles in Australian Economic Papers from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().