Sensitivity Analysis for Nonrandom Dropout: A Local Influence Approach
Emmanuel Lesaffre and
Michael G. Kenward
Biometrics, 2001, vol. 57, issue 1, 7-14
Summary. Diggle and Kenward (1994, Applied Statistics43, 49–93) proposed a selection model for continuous longitudinal data subject to nonrandom dropout. It has provoked a large debate about the role for such models. The original enthusiasm was followed by skepticism about the strong but untestable assumptions on which this type of model invariably rests. Since then, the view has emerged that these models should ideally be made part of a sensitivity analysis. This paper presents a formal and flexible approach to such a sensitivity assessment based on local influence (Cook, 1986, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B48, 133–169). The influence of perturbing a missing‐at‐random dropout model in the direction of nonrandom dropout is explored. The method is applied to data from a randomized experiment on the inhibition of testosterone production in rats.
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (18) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:biomet:v:57:y:2001:i:1:p:7-14
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0006-341X
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Biometrics from The International Biometric Society
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().