When Industrial Democracy Meets Corporate Social Responsibility — A Comparison of the Bangladesh Accord and Alliance as Responses to the Rana Plaza Disaster
Jimmy Donaghey and
Juliane Reinecke
British Journal of Industrial Relations, 2018, vol. 56, issue 1, 14-42
Abstract:
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Industrial Democracy are two paradigmatic approaches to transnational labour governance. They differ considerably with regard to the role accorded to the representation of labour. CSR tends to view workers as passive recipients of corporate†led initiatives, with little attention paid to the role of unions. Industrial Democracy centres on labour involvement: those affected by governance need to be part of it. Examining the Bangladesh Accord and Alliance as governance responses to the 2013 Rana Plaza disaster, this article offers a comparative perspective of how Industrial Democracy†oriented and CSR†oriented initiatives translate into differences in implementation. The article highlights that while CSR can foster effective problem†solving in the short run, Industrial Democracy is necessary to build governance capacities involving workers in the long run.
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (52)
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjir.12242
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:brjirl:v:56:y:2018:i:1:p:14-42
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0007-1080
Access Statistics for this article
British Journal of Industrial Relations is currently edited by Edmund Heery
More articles in British Journal of Industrial Relations from London School of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().