 Comparative institutional disadvantage: Small firms and vocational training in the British manufacturing sector in comparative perspectiveChiara Benassi, Niccolo Durazzi and Johann Fortwengel British Journal of Industrial Relations, 2022, vol. 60, issue 2, 371-390 Abstract: This article asks why British manufacturing small and medium‐sized enterprises (SMEs) struggle to meet their intermediate technical skills needs. While the comparative political economy literature typically attributes the failure to train in Britain to collective action problems, we complement this perspective by pointing at the ill‐conceived policy design of the quasi‐market for vocational education and training. In particular, we shed light on the role of training providers, as they respond to the incentive structure of the quasi‐market, especially the output‐based nature of standards and the system of funding distribution. To strengthen our argument, we compare the British case with the Italian statist system, which enables SMEs to access technical skills through school‐based vocational education, and with the German collective system, in which SMEs develop skills through apprenticeships. Date: 2022 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:brjirl:v:60:y:2022:i:2:p:371-390 Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from Access Statistics for this article British Journal of Industrial Relations is currently edited by Edmund Heery More articles in British Journal of Industrial Relations from London School of Economics Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.