ARBITRATION, INDIVISIBLE ASSETS AND THE POSSIBILITY OF MALICE

Brishti Guha

Bulletin of Economic Research, 2019, vol. 71, issue 3, 404-415

Abstract: Many real‐life contexts involve allocating an indivisible prize between two claimants. One (or both) claimants may derive ‘malice utility’ from depriving the other claimant. I study an arbitrator who does not know if malice is involved in a particular dispute, but wishes the prize to be allocated to the party with the higher intrinsic valuation for it and discuss two simple mechanisms that achieve his purpose regardless of whether malice is actually present. I examine several extensions.

Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/boer.12182

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:buecrs:v:71:y:2019:i:3:p:404-415

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0307-3378

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Bulletin of Economic Research from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().