A CASE STUDY IN POLLUTION MARKETS: DISMAL SCIENCE VS. DISMAL REALITY

Jane V. Hall and Amy L. Walton

Contemporary Economic Policy, 1996, vol. 14, issue 2, 67-78

Abstract: Economists long have argued that economic incentives can reduce pollution more efficiently than do narrow regulatory prescriptions, but this theory has not enjoyed wide application. Southern California experiences the worst air pollution in the United States and has developed the most complex set of regulatory approaches in the world to address the problem. Rising costs and increasing resistance to further regulation led to the Regional Clean Air Incentives Market (RECLAIM) program, which is expected to reduce pollution control costs by about 50 percent over a decade (relative to direct regulation). This paper describes the theoretical advantages of pollution trading, clearly identifies three criteria that acceptable economic incentive‐based programs must meet, explains the structure of RECLAIM, and raises issues regarding firm behavior in response to a newly created asset with an initial price of zero.

Date: 1996
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7287.1996.tb00614.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:coecpo:v:14:y:1996:i:2:p:67-78

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://ordering.onl ... 5-7287&ref=1465-7287

Access Statistics for this article

Contemporary Economic Policy is currently edited by Brad R. Humphreys

More articles in Contemporary Economic Policy from Western Economic Association International Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().