FREE TRADE, NATIONALISM, AND THE COMMON MAN: THE FREE TRADE AGREEMENT BETWEEN CANADA AND THE UNITED STATES

Stephen Easton

Contemporary Economic Policy, 1989, vol. 7, issue 3, 61-77

Abstract: This paper discusses the forces that have been at play in the debate over the recently concluded Canada‐U.S. Free Trade Agreement. Most economists agree that free trade is desirable and that both parties likely will gain from specialization and exchange. But many objections to this agreement have been raised, some of which are very different from those that economists usually consider. A review of the agreement and many of the arguments raised against it reinforces the basic credo that freer exchange between consenting parties leads to improved economic well‐being.

Date: 1989
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7287.1989.tb00569.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:coecpo:v:7:y:1989:i:3:p:61-77

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://ordering.onl ... 5-7287&ref=1465-7287

Access Statistics for this article

Contemporary Economic Policy is currently edited by Brad R. Humphreys

More articles in Contemporary Economic Policy from Western Economic Association International Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().