Evaluating Boards of Directors: what constitutes a good corporate board?

Lutgart van Den Berghe and Abigail Levrau

Corporate Governance: An International Review, 2004, vol. 12, issue 4, 461-478

Abstract: This paper is an attempt to identify what constitutes a good board of directors, and this is based on a comparison between academic literature, corporate governance rating systems and our field research into board practices. We observed that “traditional” academic research focused on a limited number of quantifiable board characteristics, while practitioners attach greater importance to “soft” elements, which are nearly absent in the literature and in the governance ratings. These findings highlight the need for a better understanding of all elements that determine board effectiveness. Furthermore, our results identify three areas of improvement for boards of directors.

Date: 2004
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (62)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2004.00387.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:corgov:v:12:y:2004:i:4:p:461-478

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... ref=0964-8410&site=1

Access Statistics for this article

Corporate Governance: An International Review is currently edited by William Judge

More articles in Corporate Governance: An International Review from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().