State‐oriented service‐delivery partnership with civil society organizations in the context of counter‐terrorism in Nigeria

Emeka Thaddues Njoku

Development Policy Review, 2021, vol. 39, issue 5, 757-772

Abstract: Motivation Little is known about how partnerships between the state and civil society organizations (CSOs) to deliver services as part of counter‐terrorism measures (CTMs) work in practice; nor how CSOs make sense of such partnerships and their implications. Purpose This article examines patterns in partnerships between the state and CSOs to deliver services. It investigates how CSOs perceive this partnership and the socio‐political and policy implications. Approach and Methods Faith‐based, youth/children CSOs, women’s and human rights groups engaged in capacity building, technical assistance and advocacy in counter‐terrorism operations in northeast Nigeria were studied. A mixed‐method design was adopted to examine the experiences and perspectives of CSO managers and field staff, as well as the views of government officials, including security agents involved in counter‐terrorism. Findings The state contracted the CSOs to deliver services, but not to engage in political advocacy. Thus, the state controlled the political realm and influenced the non‐political arena. CSOs believed that the service‐delivery partnership impinged on their organizational principles and capacity to demand government accountability and transparency. Policy implications CSOs should be engaged as vital and equal partners in addressing security issues. Excluding advocacy‐oriented CSOs from security measures is counter‐productive. It potentially silences public demands for transparency, accountability and justice, thereby entrenching insecurity and impinging on humanitarian interventions. Restricting CSOs to service delivery undercuts their ability to connect government and society.

Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12524

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:devpol:v:39:y:2021:i:5:p:757-772

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0950-6764

Access Statistics for this article

Development Policy Review is currently edited by David Booth

More articles in Development Policy Review from Overseas Development Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().