Northernization for Breaking‐through International Isolation: Taiwan’s Trilateral Aid Cooperation in the Middle East Refugee Crisis and beyond

Yi‐Chen Wu and Shiuh‐Shen Chien

Development Policy Review, 2022, vol. 40, issue 1

Abstract: Motivation Taiwan, a de facto independent state, previously preferred bilateral aid focused on its diplomatic partners in response to China’s efforts to isolate the country internationally. More recently, Taiwan has been active in trilateral aid co‐operation with many international agencies supporting work in camps for refugees and internally displaced persons (IDPs) and host communities in the Middle East and beyond. Purpose The article analyses how and under what circumstances Taiwan’s South–North–South (SNS) co‐operation functions, which differs from the conventional trilateral North–South–South (NSS) model. We argue that Taiwan’s trilateral aid is a desire for “Northernization” in the global aid hierarchy in order to break through its political isolation. Methods and approach The research included the collection of government documents and media reports as well as field research and off‐the‐record interviews in Jordan and Taiwan. We visited Jordan for a month each in 2018 and 2019. Findings Taiwan’s top three partners in trilateral aid co‐operation are the United States (US) and related organizations, the European Bank of Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), and the Holy See. Focusing on such co‐operation in the Middle East we analyse the consequences and impacts in three dimensions: following Northern norms in aid practices; diversifying aid resources to involve business and non‐governmental sectors; and scaling up Taiwan–US regional and global relations. The article casts new light on the complex development geography beyond the conventional North–South axes. Policy implications The case of Taiwan illustrates the need to question the conventional division between the Global North and Global South. It is also time for the former to include Taiwan as a reliable partner and to use its example to encourage other politically isolated countries and regions to play more important roles as responsible global stakeholders.

Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12556

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:devpol:v:40:y:2022:i:1:n:e12556

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0950-6764

Access Statistics for this article

Development Policy Review is currently edited by David Booth

More articles in Development Policy Review from Overseas Development Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().