Public Policy for Trans People: Lessons from Brazil for Social Inclusion

João Vitor Rodrigues Gonçalves and Liziane Angelotti Meira

Development Policy Review, 2025, vol. 43, issue 4

Abstract: Motivation In Brazil, as elsewhere, trans people are often subjected to a historical process of social exclusion. This phenomenon not only perpetuates discriminatory attitudes but also actively prevents the participation of this community in society. Consequently, social marginalisation becomes not only a method of survival, but also an involuntary decision for a large part of this minority. Objective Brazil's Transcidadania Programme, created in 2015, can be interpreted as a solution to reverse this scenario. This study aims to identify, describe and analyse the model of social reintegration used in the programme. Approach and methods We used a single case study as the main methodological resource of this qualitative research due to the uniqueness of the programme, combined with semi‐structured interviews with key actors in the programme. Conclusions The social reintegration model of the Transcidadania programme is structured around three pillars: (1) reception; (2) incentive; and (3) monitoring. Our results indicate that the model, as well as being considered institutionally viable, presents a simplified structure that can be replicated. This study can contribute to the discussions on the analysis of affirmative policies targeting sexual minorities, a focus considered scarce within affirmative policy studies. In practical terms, our findings will be of value to policymakers looking to establish and develop public policies for trans people and other sexual minorities. Political implications Access to citizenship for trans people is a challenge worldwide. There are few policies and programmes aimed at changing this situation. For this reason, we believe that the model adopted by Transcidadania could be considered an initiative capable of being disseminated to nations that, like Brazil, face serious human rights violations and controversial political contexts.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.70015

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:devpol:v:43:y:2025:i:4:n:e70015

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0950-6764

Access Statistics for this article

Development Policy Review is currently edited by David Booth

More articles in Development Policy Review from Overseas Development Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().