Environmental Protection, Rare Disasters and Discount Rates

Robert Barro

Economica, 2015, vol. 82, issue 325, 1-23

Abstract: type="main" xml:id="ecca12117-abs-0001">

The Stern Review's evaluation of environmental protection stresses low discount rates and uncertainty about environmental effects. An appropriate model for analysing this uncertainty and the associated discount rates requires sufficient risk aversion and fat-tailed uncertainty to account for the observed equity premium. Calibrations based on Epstein–Zin preferences and existing analyses of rare macroeconomic disasters suggest that optimal environmental investment can be a significant share of GDP even with reasonable rates of time preference. Optimal environmental investment increases with risk aversion and the probability and typical size of environmental disasters, but decreases with uncertainty about policy effectiveness.

Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (54)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/ecca.2014.82.issue-325 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Environmental Protection, Rare Disasters, and Discount Rates (2013)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:econom:v:82:y:2015:i:325:p:1-23

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0013-0427

Access Statistics for this article

Economica is currently edited by Frank Cowell, Tore Ellingsen and Alan Manning

More articles in Economica from London School of Economics and Political Science Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().