Economics at your fingertips  

The Effects of Exchange-Rate Volatility on Korean Trade Flows: Industry-Level Estimates

Mohsen Bahmani-Oskooee (), Scott Hegerty () and Ruixin Zhang

Economic Papers, 2014, vol. 33, issue 1, 76-94

Abstract: type="main" xml:id="ecpa12064-abs-0001"> As one of the world's most important exporters, Korea might find volatility in the won to be detrimental to trade. But, since previous studies – as well as economic theory – suggest that the impact of exchange-rate risk on individual countries trade flows can be ambiguous, each case must be tested empirically. This study does, examining 148 Korean export industries and 144 import industries vis-à-vis the rest of the world. We find that in the long run, twenty export industries respond negatively to exchange-rate risk, while twelve respond positively. For imports, however, eight have negative coefficients and fourteen have positive ones. The majority of industries are unaffected. Small Korean exporters are particularly vulnerable to exchange-rate risk, as are two large export industries. Imports in the Machinery and transport equipment sector, particularly automobiles, are most likely to see a decrease in the overall trade balance due to increased risk.

Date: 2014
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link) (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0812-0439

Access Statistics for this article

Economic Papers is currently edited by Rachel Ong

More articles in Economic Papers from The Economic Society of Australia Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().

Page updated 2019-10-12
Handle: RePEc:bla:econpa:v:33:y:2014:i:1:p:76-94