Carbon Price versus Subsidies to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Economic Papers, 2014, vol. 33, issue 3, 233-242
type="main" xml:id="ecpa12082-abs-0001"> This paper describes the operation of a price and a subsidy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHG), and it compares and contrasts efficiency, redistribution and transactions costs of the two options. An initial comparison assumes comprehensive bases and negligible transaction costs. Then, actual examples for Australia are assessed, namely the carbon tax of 2012–2014 and the proposed Direct Action plan under consideration for 2015. It is argued that the price intervention option will be more cost effective per unit of GHG reduction, that it will be simpler and easier to operate, and that as part of a budget package it can provide at least as good a net distribution outcome.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:econpa:v:33:y:2014:i:3:p:233-242
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0812-0439
Access Statistics for this article
Economic Papers is currently edited by Rachel Ong
More articles in Economic Papers from The Economic Society of Australia Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().