The Efficiency Effects of Removing the Diesel Fuel Rebate Scheme

Robert Albon

The Economic Record, 1998, vol. 74, issue 225, 145-152

Abstract: The diesel fuel rebate scheme which returns most of the excise on diesel fuel used off‐road by agricultural and mineral producers has been debated. Removal could cause three inefficiencies (input choice distortion. deadweight losses on reduced exports, and flowon inefficiencies in domestic processing) and two efficiencies (from reducing other taxes and savings on administrative and compliance costs). Empirical studies suggest high net efficiency costs from removal, but while business input taxes have no place in an efficient taxation structure, a small reduction in the rebate could yield some revenue at a low marginal deadweight loss.

Date: 1998
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.1998.tb01912.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:ecorec:v:74:y:1998:i:225:p:145-152

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0013-0249

Access Statistics for this article

The Economic Record is currently edited by Paul Miller, Glenn Otto and Martin Richardson

More articles in The Economic Record from The Economic Society of Australia Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().