Undereducation and Overeducation in the Australian Labour Market
Derby Voon and
The Economic Record, 2005, vol. 81, issue s1, S22-S33
This paper uses data from the 1996 Census of Population and Housing Household Sample File (HSF) to study the incidence of mismatch between workers' educational attainments and the requirements of their jobs, and the earnings consequences of this mismatch. It also examines whether mismatch contributes to the explanation of the gender wage differential in the Australian labour market. It is found that approximately 15.8 per cent of men and 13.6 per cent of women are overeducated, whereas approximately 18.5 per cent of women and 13.7 per cent of men are undereducated. Substantial earnings consequences are found to be associated with this mismatch, with surplus schooling yielding relatively low returns. The results suggest that mismatch does not account for the gender wage gap in the Australian labour market; rather the gender wage differential is entrenched in the fundamentals of pay determination. Copyright 2005 The Economic Society Of Australia.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (13) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/servlet/useragent ... &year=2005&part=null link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:ecorec:v:81:y:2005:i:s1:p:s22-s33
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0013-0249
Access Statistics for this article
The Economic Record is currently edited by Paul Miller, Glenn Otto and Martin Richardson
More articles in The Economic Record from The Economic Society of Australia Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().