Private or Public? Towards a Taxonomy of Optimal Ownership and Management Regimes

Stephen King and Rohan Pitchford

The Economic Record, 2008, vol. 84, issue 266, 366-377

Abstract: We develop a model to assist policy‐makers in their choice between private and public ownership for a broad range of activities, based on managers’ ability to divert resources through perks or pet projects. Qualitative information is always required to demonstrate that public ownership is optimal. More ‘public’ firms are synonymous with greater control of such actions, but generate greater bureaucracy costs. The flat incentives faced by public managers can be socially desirable when commercially productive activities generate large social harms relative to profit, but are undesirable when these activities are either benign or create external social benefits. Applications are discussed.

Date: 2008
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (14)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.2008.00497.x

Related works:
Working Paper: A Taxonomy of Optimal Ownership and Management Regimes (2002)
Working Paper: Private or Public? A Taxonomy of Optimal Ownership and Management Regimes (1998)
Working Paper: Private or Public? A Taxonomy of Optimal Ownership and Management Regimes (1998)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:ecorec:v:84:y:2008:i:266:p:366-377

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0013-0249

Access Statistics for this article

The Economic Record is currently edited by Paul Miller, Glenn Otto and Martin Richardson

More articles in The Economic Record from The Economic Society of Australia Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().