Idiosyncratic Risk, Investor Base, and Returns
Doina C. Chichernea,
Michael F. Ferguson and
Financial Management, 2015, vol. 44, issue 2, 267-293
type="main"> Using four different proxies for a firm's investor base we demonstrate that idiosyncratic risk premiums are larger for neglected stocks and smaller or economically insignificant for visible stocks. Since neglected stocks have greater idiosyncratic volatility (IV), the total IV risk premium (price × quantity) for neglected stocks will be greater than that of visible stocks. Additionally, we find a positive size effect and negative beta effect after controlling for IV. Overall, our results provide strong support for Merton's theory that market segmentation induced by incomplete information is an important component of the influence of IV in the cross-section of returns.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:finmgt:v:44:y:2015:i:2:p:267-293
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0046-3892
Access Statistics for this article
Financial Management is currently edited by William G. Christie
More articles in Financial Management from Financial Management Association International Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing ().