Rational Expectations and Security Analysts' Earnings Forecasts
Lucy Ackert and
William C Hunter
The Financial Review, 1995, vol. 30, issue 3, 427-43
Abstract:
This paper investigates the rationality of security analysts' forecasts. The forecasts of analysts participating in Lynch, Jones, and Ryan's "Institutional Brokers Estimate System" (I/B/E/S) data base are evaluated relative to past values of their own forecast errors, past values of forecasted earnings per share, and quarterly percentage changes in publicly available macroeconomic and financial time series. The publicly available series include the the consumer price index, unemployment rate, oil prices stock prices, gross national product, and corporate profits. The authors conduct a generalized orthogonality test and include only information available to analysts at the time the forecasts are made. The empirical results reject analyst forecast rationality, but not without exception. Copyright 1995 by MIT Press.
Date: 1995
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
Working Paper: Rational expectations and security analysts' earnings forecasts (1992)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:finrev:v:30:y:1995:i:3:p:427-43
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0732-8516
Access Statistics for this article
The Financial Review is currently edited by Cynthia J. Campbell and Arnold R. Cowan
More articles in The Financial Review from Eastern Finance Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().