The Role of Alternative Methodology on the Relation between Portfolio Size and Diversification

Kristine L Beck, Steven B Perfect and Pamela P Peterson

The Financial Review, 1996, vol. 31, issue 2, 381-406

Abstract: An important concern in portfolio management is the number of securities needed to create a well-diversified portfolio. The number of securities that constitute a well-diversified portfolio, however, varies widely among studies. It is demonstrated that past conclusions are highly sensitive to the methodology used in quantifying diversification. This finding motivates the development of alternative methods that reduce the effect of repeated replications on test results. The first approach exploits the power curves of statistical tests, whereas the second approach suggests the use of more robust statistics. Both approaches provide researchers with guidance in the design of future diversification studies. Copyright 1996 by MIT Press.

Date: 1996
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (13)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:finrev:v:31:y:1996:i:2:p:381-406

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0732-8516

Access Statistics for this article

The Financial Review is currently edited by Cynthia J. Campbell and Arnold R. Cowan

More articles in The Financial Review from Eastern Finance Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().