Financial consequences of reputational damage: Evidence from government economic incentives
Brian Blank (),
Brandy Hadley and
The Financial Review, 2021, vol. 56, issue 4, 693-719
We investigate and quantify the financial consequences of corporate reputation by using manually assembled litigation, fraud, and cyberattack data from 2000 to 2018 to measure reputation changes following events that are often tied to public scrutiny. We examine the role of reputation in government subsidy awards and find reputational damage is linked to lower subsidies and Mega Deals, particularly tax‐related and state government awards. Moreover, subsidies only relate to higher firm value for firms without reputational damage. Our findings suggest that reputation is an important determinant of relatively opaque economic incentive awards and that reputational damage constrains the benefits thereof.
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:finrev:v:56:y:2021:i:4:p:693-719
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0732-8516
Access Statistics for this article
The Financial Review is currently edited by Cynthia J. Campbell and Arnold R. Cowan
More articles in The Financial Review from Eastern Finance Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().