Critical feminist analysis of STEM mentoring programs: A meta‐synthesis of the existing literature
Makini Beck,
Jillian Cadwell,
Anne Kern,
Ke Wu,
Maniphone Dickerson and
Melinda Howard
Gender, Work and Organization, 2022, vol. 29, issue 1, 167-187
Abstract:
We conducted a meta‐synthesis review of existing literature on science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) mentoring programs for women. Critical feminist theory (CFT) was used to understand how mentoring programs support retention and occupational advancement of women in traditionally male‐dominated STEM fields. Four primary strands of CFT were explored: gender, oppression/patriarchy, social institutions, and systemic change. Traditional models of mentoring encompass varied approaches, including institutionally enforced programs, formal and informal programs, paired peer grouping, as well as face‐to‐face and online forums. However, low levels of retention and self‐stated lack of professional satisfaction for women in STEM fields continue to plague those professions. This study reviews the literature on mentoring programs that have been implemented to support women in STEM, thus adding to the epistemology of mentoring women in STEM through feminist discourse.
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12729
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:gender:v:29:y:2022:i:1:p:167-187
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0968-6673
Access Statistics for this article
Gender, Work and Organization is currently edited by David Knights, Deborah Kerfoot and Ida Sabelis
More articles in Gender, Work and Organization from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().