Gender and Occupational Prestige. Testing the Devaluation Theory in Spain
Inmaculada García‐Mainar,
Pablo García‐Ruiz and
Víctor M. Montuenga
Gender, Work and Organization, 2025, vol. 32, issue 5, 1982-1993
Abstract:
The devaluation theory, that is, that occupations where women predominate become less socially valued than those where men are in the majority, has not reached a unanimous conclusion in the empirical literature, especially when prestige is used as an indicator of the valuation of the occupation. The changing economic and social circumstances may influence the fulfillment of this hypothesis over time. Using regression analysis, this article tests the adequacy of the devaluation theory in the Spanish labor market at two points in time, 1991 and 2013. Previously, it also describes and analyzes whether the ordering of occupations has changed substantially in this period, using two different comparable scales. The results confirm a weakening in the support of the devaluation theory such that gender segregation of occupations does not necessarily imply differences in their social valuation. This result can be attributed to (i) the increase of prestige in some feminized occupations and (ii) the increase of women's participation in prestigious occupations.
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.13262
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:gender:v:32:y:2025:i:5:p:1982-1993
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0968-6673
Access Statistics for this article
Gender, Work and Organization is currently edited by David Knights, Deborah Kerfoot and Ida Sabelis
More articles in Gender, Work and Organization from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().