Trade and Diversity: Is There a Case for ‘Cultural Protectionism?’

Carsten Eckel

German Economic Review, 2006, vol. 7, issue 4, 403-418

Abstract: Abstract. In contrast to the predictions of standard models of international trade, globalization critics are claiming that trade destroys diversity. We demonstrate that with endogenous sunk costs, trade integration in horizontally differentiated industries can indeed lead to a fall in diversity. Consumers are faced with a tradeoff between gains in real income and a loss in diversity, so that the impact on welfare is ambiguous. However, it is possible through fiscal policies to replicate pre‐trade choices and still realize gains in real income. Thus, calls for a ‘cultural protectionism’ are not justified.

Date: 2006
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0475.2006.00126.x

Related works:
Journal Article: Trade and Diversity: Is There a Case for ‘Cultural Protectionism?’ (2006)
Working Paper: Trade and diversity: Is there a case for ’cultural protectionism?’ (2006)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:germec:v:7:y:2006:i:4:p:403-418

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=1465-6485

Access Statistics for this article

German Economic Review is currently edited by Bernhard Felderer, Joseph F. Francois, Ivo Welch, Urs Schweizer and David E. Wildasin

More articles in German Economic Review from Verein für Socialpolitik Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().