Why Reform is Needed: WTO ‘Public Body’ Jurisprudence

Dukgeun Ahn

Global Policy, 2021, vol. 12, issue S3, 61-70

Abstract: WTO jurisprudence on what constitutes a ‘public body’ has provoked one of the most controversial debates on the legitimacy and integrity of the WTO dispute settlement system and the WTO in general. Dispute settlement panels and the Appellate Body disagree on the interpretation and application of the public body concept, especially when applied to Chinese SOEs. In fact, the interpretation of ‘public body’ in the WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures tackles a more fundamental question of whether the WTO system can handle the state capitalism of China and other non‐market economies within the framework of global trade rules that are primarily designed to deal with free market economies. The fate of the WTO system critically hinges on how legal interpretation of ‘public body’ can address structural differences of members’ economic systems. Addressing this challenge requires WTO members to implement long overdue legal and institutional reforms.

Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12929

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:glopol:v:12:y:2021:i:s3:p:61-70

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=1758-5880

Access Statistics for this article

Global Policy is currently edited by David Held, Patrick Dunleavy and Eva-Maria Nag

More articles in Global Policy from London School of Economics and Political Science Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().