Global Labour Governance by Numbers: A Comparison of the ILO and OECD

Vicente Silva, Huw Thomas and John Berten

Global Policy, 2025, vol. 16, issue 2, 266-274

Abstract: The emergence of governance by numbers (GBN) has seen the increasing use of metrics to influence government and corporate behaviour, but its uptake varies significantly across international organisations. This study examines the adoption of GBN in global labour governance at the International Labour Organisation (ILO) and the Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development (OECD). Using a comparative institutional approach, we highlight the ILO's resistance to developing indicators of decent work and economic performance, despite support from the labour movement. Conversely, the OECD has fully embraced GBN through labour market performance measurements, which makes some of its normative proposals less visible due to their qualitative nature. We conclude that the adoption of GBN is not inevitable and depends on the organisational cultures and structures of international organisations.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70002

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:glopol:v:16:y:2025:i:2:p:266-274

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=1758-5880

Access Statistics for this article

Global Policy is currently edited by David Held, Patrick Dunleavy and Eva-Maria Nag

More articles in Global Policy from London School of Economics and Political Science Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().