United Nations 2030 Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals: Hybrid Institutional Complexes as Hegemony‐Building?

Julija Loginovic and Stuart Shields

Global Policy, 2025, vol. 16, issue 4, 724-730

Abstract: This paper adopts a Critical Political Economy (CPE) perspective to analyse the success or otherwise of the UN Sustainable Development Goals’ (SDGs) Hybrid Institutional Complex (HIC). The paper takes a counterintuitive approach in that it is less concerned with the institutional form of that HIC but rather their socio‐economic content. The paper does this by building on Abbott and Faude's governance outcomes of ‘substantive’ and ‘political’ fit, emphasising the notion of ‘ideological fit’, understood as a crucial part of hegemony‐building in the current conjuncture. Key to hegemony‐building is that the greater degree of institutional diversity of HICs constitutes a way to reorganise inter‐and intra‐class relations to co‐opt a greater variety of policy actors at multiple transnational scales. Rather than focusing on the SDGs' performance against specific development goals, the paper argues that the institutional coherence of the HIC lacks hegemonic depth that is translated into the uneven implementation of the SDGs and the disappointing progress against individual targets. Instead, the CPE approach shows how shallow hegemonies have failed at generating substantive development transformations but have instead succeeded at hegemony‐building for class‐based governance, just not for meaningful development.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70048

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:glopol:v:16:y:2025:i:4:p:724-730

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=1758-5880

Access Statistics for this article

Global Policy is currently edited by David Held, Patrick Dunleavy and Eva-Maria Nag

More articles in Global Policy from London School of Economics and Political Science Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().