Domestic Institutions and Global Value Chains: Offshoring in Germany's Core Industrial Sectors
Ferdi De Ville
Global Policy, 2018, vol. 9, issue S2, 12-20
Abstract:
Do domestic institutions affect industrialised countries’ positions in global value chains? A key insight from literature on global value chains is that a firm's decision to offshore depends on the trade‐off between price competitive gains and coordination costs. The role of domestic institutions in this decision has largely been neglected in global value chains analyses. However, a core insight from literature on varieties of capitalism is that the outcome of this trade‐off differs depending on the national institutions in which firms are embedded. National economies vary in terms of the importance of non‐market institutions for firms’ production decisions. This article integrates insights from both literatures, resulting in the hypotheses that for firms in coordinated market economies offshoring has lower gains and higher costs than for firms in liberal market economies and that this will translate in a different importance and/or geography of global value chains. We empirically test these hypotheses by focusing on Germany. We find that Germany is intensively integrated in international value chains, but that its core sectors have made relatively more use of ‘near shoring’, as this allows them to retain comparative institutional advantages. This has permitted Germany to maintain and even expand output and employment in industry.
Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12610
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:glopol:v:9:y:2018:i:s2:p:12-20
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=1758-5880
Access Statistics for this article
Global Policy is currently edited by David Held, Patrick Dunleavy and Eva-Maria Nag
More articles in Global Policy from London School of Economics and Political Science Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().