Auctions with loss‐averse bidders
Roland Eisenhuth and
Mara Grunewald
International Journal of Economic Theory, 2020, vol. 16, issue 2, 129-152
Abstract:
If bidders consider gains and losses in the context of whether they receive the object or not and how much they pay separately, the expected revenue is higher in the all‐pay auction than in the first‐price auction; if they consider gains and losses over the entire risk‐neutral payoff, this revenue ranking is reversed. In laboratory experiments, we auction money and a real object: the average revenue is significantly higher in the first‐price auction than in the all‐pay auction, suggesting that bidders behave according to wide and not narrow bracketing of gains and losses in both auction settings.
Date: 2020
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijet.12189
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:ijethy:v:16:y:2020:i:2:p:129-152
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=1742-7355
Access Statistics for this article
International Journal of Economic Theory is currently edited by Kazuo Nishimura and Makoto Yano
More articles in International Journal of Economic Theory from The International Society for Economic Theory
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().