The glass menagerie of urban governance and social cohesion: concepts and stakes/concepts as stakes

Thomas Maloutas and Maro Pantelidou Malouta

International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2004, vol. 28, issue 2, 449-465

Abstract: Social goals and social action are increasingly framed by a host of ambiguously egalitarian notions. The ambiguity of notions like ‘social cohesion’ originates principally in the tentative accommodation of competition and social justice that former radical approaches considered in fundamental contradiction. The social cohesion terminology has become part of political realism and the question is whether such notions are or could be fuelling practices that promote social justice, overcoming the ambiguity/contradiction of the different/competing interpretations nebulously juxtaposed in their fluid definition. This article comments on interrelated ambiguities in the content of social cohesion, governance and tolerance starting with a reformulated goal (social cohesion) which necessitates new means of implementation (‘new governance’) that entail the dominance of non‐conflictual social relations (tolerance). Social cohesion, governance and tolerance are Janus‐faced concepts, full of restrictions and contradictions but also full of possibilities related to the mobilizing potential of their inherently positive meaning. Social cohesion and governance would become real stakes if radical discourse and politics tried to invest them with content and meaning that would effectively transgress their legitimating function of conservative social regulation, and create massive demand for more social justice both in terms of redistributive justice and of democracy. L'action et les objectifs sociaux sont de plus en plus conditionnés par une foule de notions soi‐disant égalitaires. L'ambiguîté de concepts tels que la cohésion sociale émane surtout de l'essai d'adaptation entre concurrence et justice sociale, considérées précédemment par les approches radicales comme fondamentalement contradictoires. La terminologie de la cohésion sociale s'est peu à peu intégrée au réalisme politique, mais il s'agit de savoir si de telles notions nourrissent ou pourraient nourrir des pratiques favorables à la justice sociale, en éliminant la contradiction/ambiguîté des interprétations diverses/concurrentes vaguement juxtaposées dans le flou des définitions. L'article étudie des ambiguïtés corrélatives contenues dans cohésion sociale, gouvernance et tolérance, en partant d'un objectif reformulé (cohésion sociale) nécessitant des moyens originaux de mise en uvre (‘nouvelle gouvernance’) porteurs de relations sociales non‐conflictuelles (tolérance). Ces trois notions à deux visages sont empreintes de restrictions et contradictions, mais aussi de possibilités liées au potentiel mobilisateur de leur sens intrinsèquement positif. Cohésion sociale et gouvernance deviendraient des intérêts réels si le discours radical et la politique s'efforçaient de leur donner des contenus et significations qui transgresseraient effectivement leur fonction justificative de régulation sociale conservatrice, et créeraient une demande massive pour davantage de justice sociale en termes de justice redistributive et de démocratie.

Date: 2004
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (16)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00528.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:28:y:2004:i:2:p:449-465

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0309-1317

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Urban and Regional Research is currently edited by Alan Harding, Roger Keil and Jeremy Seekings

More articles in International Journal of Urban and Regional Research from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().