Working‐time preferences among women: Challenging assumptions on underemployment, work centrality and work–life balance

Laura Lamolla, Conxita Folguera‐i‐bellmunt and Xavier Fernández‐i‐marín

International Labour Review, 2021, vol. 160, issue 3, 431-451

Abstract: This article examines the working‐time preferences of women working 20‐hour weeks, on different, stable schedules, in manufacturing jobs. The authors conducted qualitative and quantitative research to identify worker profiles based on these women's working‐time preferences and the reasons for them. Their findings add nuance to previous research by highlighting that: (1) some, but not all, of these employees can be considered underemployed; (2) working 20 hours a week does not equate to low work centrality and is compatible with working hours being experienced as meaningful; (3) some part‐time women workers want to keep time for non‐caring, non‐working activities despite earning a low salary.

Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/ilr.12193

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:intlab:v:160:y:2021:i:3:p:431-451

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0020-7780

Access Statistics for this article

International Labour Review is currently edited by Mark Lansky

More articles in International Labour Review from International Labour Organization Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().