A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: Multidimensional scaling and VOS

Nees Jan van Eck, Ludo Waltman, Rommert Dekker and Jan van den Berg

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010, vol. 61, issue 12, 2405-2416

Abstract: VOS is a new mapping technique that can serve as an alternative to the well‐known technique of multidimensional scaling (MDS). We present an extensive comparison between the use of MDS and the use of VOS for constructing bibliometric maps. In our theoretical analysis, we show the mathematical relation between the two techniques. In our empirical analysis, we use the techniques for constructing maps of authors, journals, and keywords. Two commonly used approaches to bibliometric mapping, both based on MDS, turn out to produce maps that suffer from artifacts. Maps constructed using VOS turn out not to have this problem. We conclude that in general maps constructed using VOS provide a more satisfactory representation of a dataset than maps constructed using well‐known MDS approaches.

Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (120)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21421

Related works:
Journal Article: A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: Multidimensional scaling and VOS (2010)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jamist:v:61:y:2010:i:12:p:2405-2416

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1532-2890

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology from Association for Information Science & Technology
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().