Counting methods, country rank changes, and counting inflation in the assessment of national research productivity and impact
Mu‐Hsuan Huang,
Chi‐Shiou Lin and
Dar‐Zen Chen
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011, vol. 62, issue 12, 2427-2436
Abstract:
The counting of papers and citations is fundamental to the assessment of research productivity and impact. In an age of increasing scientific collaboration across national borders, the counting of papers produced by collaboration between multiple countries, and citations of such papers, raises concerns in country‐level research evaluation. In this study, we compared the number counts and country ranks resulting from five different counting methods. We also observed inflation depending on the method used. Using the 1989 to 2008 physics papers indexed in ISI's Web of Science as our sample, we analyzed the counting results in terms of paper count (research productivity) as well as citation count and citation–paper ratio (CP ratio) based evaluation (research impact). The results show that at the country‐level assessment, the selection of counting method had only minor influence on the number counts and country rankings in each assessment. However, the influences of counting methods varied between paper count, citation count, and CP ratio based evaluation. The findings also suggest that the popular counting method (whole counting) that gives each collaborating country one full credit may not be the best counting method. Straight counting that accredits only the first or the corresponding author or fractional counting that accredits each collaborator with partial and weighted credit might be the better choices.
Date: 2011
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (30)
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21625
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jamist:v:62:y:2011:i:12:p:2427-2436
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1532-2890
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology from Association for Information Science & Technology
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().