EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

On the role of poetic versus nonpoetic features in “kindred” and diachronic poetry attribution

Brent D. Fegley and Vetle I. Torvik

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2012, vol. 63, issue 11, 2165-2181

Abstract: Author attribution studies have demonstrated remarkable success in applying orthographic and lexicographic features of text in a variety of discrimination problems. What might poetic features, such as syllabic stress and mood, contribute? We address this question in the context of two different attribution problems: (a) kindred: differentiate Langston Hughes’ early poems from those of kindred poets and (b) diachronic: differentiate Hughes’ early from his later poems. Using a diverse set of 535 generic text features, each categorized as poetic or nonpoetic, correlation‐based greedy forward search ranked the features and a support vector machine classified the poems. A small subset of features (∼10) achieved cross‐validated precision and recall as high as 87%. Poetic features (rhyme patterns particularly) were nearly as effective as nonpoetic in kindred discrimination, but less effective diachronically. In other words, Hughes used both poetic and nonpoetic features in distinctive ways and his use of nonpoetic features evolved systematically while he continued to experiment with poetic features. These findings affirm qualitative studies attesting to structural elements from Black oral tradition and Black folk music (blues) and to the internal consistency of Hughes’ early poetry.

Date: 2012
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22727

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jamist:v:63:y:2012:i:11:p:2165-2181

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1532-2890

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology from Association for Information Science & Technology
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:63:y:2012:i:11:p:2165-2181